🔗 Share this article

As Donald Trump's influence wanes and his behavior grows increasingly volatile, he has intensified vitriolic attacks aimed at women in media and ethnic communities, with Somali Americans being the latest target. These disparaging remarks gain traction stems from their malice and his platform, not their factual accuracy. In a parallel manner, his administration's offensive against immigrants are poorly executed and driven by misinformation. It is abundantly clear that the objective is not targeting individuals with criminal histories. The assault is directed at people of color.

From Native Americans with official tribal documentation to naturalized US citizens, from essential workers in construction and healthcare to military veterans, university attendees, people in their own homes, and very young children: a broad cross-section of the country's inhabitants are being threatened.

"Immigration enforcement raids are brutal, inhumane and achieve nothing for community security," states a leading political figure from New York. Scenes featuring officers concealing their faces shattering windows and dragging parents away from infants, instilling fear and hindering the function of institutions, undermines safety entirely.

These waves of orchestrated bigotry—focusing on people from Haiti in the 2024 campaign, Venezuelans this year, and most recently Somali Americans—rely extensively on libelous lies and insults. The reason is simple: the truthful data about these communities cannot support such hostility.

The Imaginary Nation of White People Versus Actual History

The strategy of frightening and vilifying claims to seek at recreating a uniformly white United States which is a fiction. Although America had a larger white population in the youth of today's white supremacists, it was never exclusively a "white country". In 1776, the thirteen founding colonies included a significant percentage of African and Native American individuals—certain states in the South had Black populations exceeding a third.

Following American expansion, annexing Texas in 1844 and acquiring northern Mexico in 1848, it incorporated a large community of Hispanic settlers long established in the modern Southwest and California. Historical records show the first African Muslim in this land came as part of a Spanish exploration party almost one hundred years prior to the Mayflower's Puritan passengers reached the shores of New England in 1620.

Demographic Realities Against Coercive Fantasies

The persecution of vast numbers of brown-skinned individuals and even mass deportations will not manufacture the all-white nation of far-right dreams. A city like Los Angeles, for instance, is close to 50% Hispanic, and despite enforcement outrages, detentions and removals, it remains so. The city's very name is Spanish, an ongoing testament of who was there first.

The entirety of this animus and oppression looks like the fear of bigots attempting to believe they can stop the coming changes of a country no longer predominantly white through sheer brutality.

It is coupled with an attack on abortion access that is, sometimes, explicitly designed to encourage white women to have more children. The rationale cites a below-replacement birthrate in the US, a phenomenon less impactful than in other countries because of a young, industrious immigrant workforce that sustains the economy. Yet, instead of offering the social support that might make raising children easier, the strategy has been based on punishment and force.

A prominent journalist observes that the reproductive politics espoused by figures like JD Vance—along with insults toward childless women—constitute a form of pronatalism. This philosophy "typically merges worries about declining birth rates with opposition to immigration and anti-women's rights viewpoints."

In a similar vein, analyses show that "efforts to bolster the fertility rate do not compensate for broader policies designed to cut federal support programs like healthcare for the poor and insurance for kids. The so-called 'pro-family' focus is not just for promoting having children. Rather, it is utilized as a tool to advance a conservative agenda that endangers women's health, reproductive rights, and economic participation."

Contradictory Strategies and Public Rejection

Together, the anti-immigrant and pronatalist policies represent an attempt to forcibly alter the country's population future. Ultimately, they represent foolish bullying by proponents of hate who inadvertently reveal that their assertions of being better must be rooted in race and gender; absent these categories, their positions devolve into incoherent nonsense.

Much of the justification offered by the Trump team does not match up with observable realities and actual outcomes. For example, naval operations in the southern Caribbean frequently focus on tiny boats which are not proven to be carrying narcotics and incapable of reaching US shores. Similarly, Venezuela's role in fentanyl trafficking is minimal, and its involvement with cocaine is much smaller than that of other South American nations.

The administration's stance extends to climate issues, with a rejection of "climate change ideology" and "Net Zero goals." An emotional commitment to fossil fuels, particularly coal, resulting in measures that compel localities to invest in outdated and polluting energy sources while sabotaging cheaper, cleaner renewables. Concurrently, health officials have promoted unscientific nutritional plans while eroding general public health safeguards.

The foundational assumption of the attacks on immigrants is that non-white individuals not born in the US are threatening outsiders. However, across the nation—in cities like L.A. and Charlotte, from Chicago to Portland—it is the administration's own agents, immigration enforcement personnel, whom many residents perceive as the dangerous and hostile interlopers.

There is no clearer sign of the broad repudiation of this approach than the thousands of people mobilizing, demonstrating, facing danger and detention to protect their communities. Municipality after municipality has stood up in protection of its people. No amount of derogatory language or intimidation can change that reality.